The incoming Bharatiya Janata
Party (BJP) led National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government opted to invite
Heads of the State of BIMSTEC alliance for the swearing-in ceremony of Prime
Minister Narendra Modi and his first set of Cabinet colleagues, on May 30th.
BIMSTEC stands for the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-sectoral Technical
and Economic Cooperation and includes as its members, Bangladesh, Myanmar, Sri
Lanka, Thailand, Nepal, Bhutan and of course, India. During the swearing-in of
the NDA Government in 2014, the heads of state of SAARC (South Asian
Association for Regional Cooperation) nations were invited and prominent among
the guests was Nawaz Sharif, the then prime minister of Pakistan.
India cannot be
diplomatically faulted for changing the list of invitees, but there remains a
lingering feeling that the exercise has been carried out in order to avoid
inviting the prime minister of Pakistan, a country which is a member of SAARC
but not BIMSTEC. The reason, quite
apparently, is to continue with the posture of not engaging with Pakistan till
such time that the neighbouring country puts a check on terror activities from
its soil targeted against India, especially so, since the NDA government is
coming to power predominantly on the mandate of national security.
Indian General Elections were keenly followed by Pakistani media, their websites
provided live updates of the results even as TV news commentators debated
the impact of Modi’s sweeping victory. It would be interesting here to see what Pakistan media has to say about
the return to power of Prime Minister Narendra Modi.
Dawn, a prominent English
daily of Pakistan, in an editorial, termed the result to be a victory of
communal politics. “For the world’s largest democracy, the writing is on
the wall: communal politics in India has triumphed in an age that will define
the future of the republic,” it wrote. “Notably, the months leading
up to Mr Modi’s campaign were marked by anti-Muslim and anti-Pakistan rants,
with India going so far as to escalate tensions by conducting air strikes
inside Pakistan in order to whip up nationalist sentiment,” it added, as reported by News 18 and some
other news outlets.
Another Pakistani media
outlet, the News International, attempted to highlight the “Right wing” credentials
of the incoming government. “His re-election reinforces a global trend of
right-wing populists sweeping to victory, from the United States to Brazil and
Italy, often after adopting harsh positions on protectionism, immigration and
defence,” it said in a report.
The Express Tribune, another
prominent English daily of Pakistan, stated, “Modi’s opponents and critics fear that India’s secular
foundation is under serious threat. The re-election of Modi is also of great
interest for Pakistan. His previous five-year term showed that Modi could take
steps for peace but at the same time lead the two countries to a war. Against
this backdrop what should we expect from him in next five years in office?”
Some independent writers and
columnists in Pakistan have offered praise to Modi in his moment of victory.
“If the BJP and Modi have won this election, they perhaps deserved to win.
They put in a great deal of hard work and have had the hunger to win,”
says a well known journalist, Aijaz Zaka Syed. However, his further elaboration
used a critique of the opposition to strike at the core of brand Modi, “It
failed to offer a positive, redeeming narrative to counter the BJP’s campaign
of hate and toxicity,” he wrote.
Pakistan, once again, is following
the policy of offering dialogue with India but in a negative manner. The
foreign office of Pakistan is attempting to create a narrative based on the
tried and tested route of the United Nations resolutions, knowing fully well
that India will not respond to this line. Also being significantly played out
by Pakistan is the meeting between Indian Foreign Minister Sushma Swaraj and
her Pakistani counterpart Shah Mehmood Qureshi at the sidelines of the
Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meet in Kyrgyzstan. Pakistan is making
a lot of noise about the meeting being a harbinger of good days to come.
Pakistan has also attempted to play down the decision of the Indian
Government to not invite the Pakistani premier for the swearing-in ceremony by
putting the cause as “internal politics” of the country. “His [Modi’s] entire focus [during the
election campaign] was on Pakistan-bashing. It was unwise to expect that he can
get rid of this narrative [soon],” said Shah Mehmood Qureshi.
olive branch came from Prime Minister Imran Khan himself when he tweeted a
goodwill message. “Look
forward to working with him for peace, progress and prosperity in South Asia,” Imran
said Khan in the message.
It is quite evident that Pakistan
is desperate for initiation of the dialogue process but lacks the grace to say
so openly. It is continuing with its attempts to place itself on a high moral
pedestal in the global arena not realising that the international community is
as exasperated with the continuous harping on the redundant UN Resolutions as is
India. It is also unwilling to give credit to India for having conducted the
largest democratic exercise in the world in a free and fair manner and thus put
in place a strong and popular government.
Pakistan in nurturing a
belief that the strong posture adopted by Prime Minister Narendra Modi was
purely for electoral reasons and now a thaw can be expected. It feels that a
hard line approach is not sustainable for India. Nothing can be further from truth;
India under Modi will not succumb to diplomatic blackmail by a global pariah
like Pakistan. It is only when the country demonstrates its good intentions by
dismantling terror modules operating on its soil and by taking a more practical
and pragmatic diplomatic posture that dialogue will resume. Till then its
belligerent foreign minister can harangue all he wants; India will not